Jeanne Birdsall has consistently avowed that it takes her
three years to write a Penderwicks novel. The
Penderwicks at Point Mouette came out in 2011. So (allowing for the
vagaries of the editing and publishing process) the next volume of Penderwickia
will arrive in stores next month right on schedule.
Interestingly, even more time has passed within the world of
the Penderwicks than in our world. When last we saw them, Rosalind, Skye, Jane,
and Batty were 13, 12, 11, and five years old. Ben was “too small to be without his mother.” As The Penderwicks in Spring opens,
Rosalind is away at college, Skye and Jane are in high school, and Batty and
Ben are in fifth and second grade, respectively. Aging the characters up like
this is an interesting – even unusual - approach to an ongoing series. There’s
plenty of precedent for doing it the other way – Joey Pigza being last year’s
most notable example – but Birdsall has always been clear about her vision for
the series, which seems to involve seeing the sisters all the way to adulthood.
It could be difficult to balance that goal with her other
priority, which is to keep the series solidly in middle grade territory. In a 2013 Horn Book article, she addressed the
importance of keeping middle grade separate from YA: “But in terms of maintaining the boundaries of
the middle grade category — so that children know where to go for books that
address their particular lives — it matters a great deal. “ In practical terms,
that seems to mean that Penderwicks novels will always focus on the characters
who actually fall within the middle grade age range. In The Penderwicks in Spring, that would be Batty and Ben. Skye, Jane,
Rosalind (and Jeffrey, and even Tommy Geiger) are present, but in the
background. The story is told exclusively from Batty and Ben’s points of view.
As a reader and fan, it took me a while to get on board with
that approach, because it requires Birdsall to alter her usual narrative
pattern. The Penderwicks exist very much in the tradition of the family novel,
which has a clear structure: chapters alternate between the points of view of
the siblings, and each sibling has a conflict to overcome (sometimes in
addition to an overarching family conflict). That’s how it worked for the Little Women a century and a half ago,
and that’s how it worked for the Family Fletcher last year. The Penderwicks in Spring is different.
It’s all Batty. Ben is there too, but really, most of Ben’s conflicts have to do
with worrying about Batty (and keeping her secrets).
So it’s Batty’s show, and a dark, dark show it is. There has
always been an undercurrent of melancholy in the Penderwicks’ world, but in
this book, it actually pulls us under, right along with Batty. She alone has to wrestle with the central
tragedy at the heart of their family, and as Birdsall plunged us into those icy
emotional waters, I really wasn’t sure she was going to be able to pull us back
out effectively.
Reader, she does. Though Batty’s quiet struggle is at the
heart of the book, it echoes through the rest of the family and their friends
(Jeffrey, the Geigers), and in the end, it is the whole Penderwick tribe that
emerges stronger for it. When spring comes to Gardam Street, they have earned
it.
This is not to say that the book is an unqualified success.
Most notably, I’m not sure that Ben is as strong a character as his older
siblings, and I was disappointed that he didn’t have more of his own story (in
a 350 page book, you would think there would be room for it).
Overall, though,
I think this is a satisfying penultimate volume in the Penderwick saga. There are
welcome moments of levity (provided by Jane’s and Rosalind’s ridiculous gentlemen
suitors and Batty’s shabby dog-walking charges), as well as the unflinching
emotional authenticity we’ve come to expect from Jeanne Birdsall.
(As for Newbery? It’s a long shot. Despite being so
temporally separate from its predecessors, I don’t think the book works without
previous experience with the Penderwicks.)
Publication in March, 2015, by Alfred A. Knopf Books for Young Readers
I loved The Penderwicks, but found book two to be a bit lacking, so I never continued with Point Mouette. Perhaps because you speak of its melancholic tone, I feel drawn toward reading this entry - even though it may not have Newbery potential. I just can't imagine a sad Penderwick book, and must see what this tragedy is. Plus, Batty was always my favorite Penderwick girl.
ReplyDeleteIt is terribly sad! So if you like that, and you like Batty, this may be the book for you. You'll want to go back and read Point Mouette, though, because it lays some of the groundwork, plot-wise.
DeleteHow were you able to get it early?! I might just die if I have to wait till march 24th...
DeleteCourtenay -- it involved having Rachael tell me "Get me the new Penderwicks while I'm in my Notable Recordings for Children committee meeting," and then my standing by the publisher's booth until they opened the special cabinet (for real!) that had the advance copies inside and handed me one.
Deletealso you can pre-order, before they're selling books. that's what my family did when they got me "the penderwicks in spring" -- also may I add this series is one of my all-time favorites and I still read them again and again.
Delete